SpaceX chief (Elon-Musk) Refuses—To grant Ukraine’s Access to Star-Link for the Offensive Purposes

Elon Musk has refused to turn on his Starlink satellite network for a proposed Ukrainian attack on Russian ships near occupied Crimea, a US report details.

Where it is reportedly not the first time Musk has called the shots by cutting off Starlink access, Ukrainian officials have raised concerns over the power that the South-African billionaire wields in the war.

On this occasion, the Ukrainian military was forced to abandon explosive-laden drones in the Black Sea after access to Starlink was removed.

So enraged was General Valeriy Zaluzhnyi, the leader of Ukraine’s armed forces, by the intervention that he took the matter straight to the US General Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, according to the New York Times.

General Zaluzhnyi is said to have told his American counterpart that it was not the first time that Elon Musk, 52, had restricted access.

Mykhailo Podolyak, a Ukrainian presidential adviser, told The Telegraph: “The issue is that at critical stages of the war, we desperately need absolute operational and technical independence.

“That is, the dependence of decision-making and its implementation must be 100 per cent. The risks for our military are too great when the course of offensive operations depends on external circumstances or third parties.”

On the system’s importance, Mr Podolyak said: “It is vital. At the very least, to balance Russian capabilities and to have effective command of large military groups.”

He added: “Starlink is about defence, advancement, and survival. He nor is staff will ever be engaging the system to make a use for — any sort of an OFFENSIVE capabilities of the system.

Ulrike Franke, a senior fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, has since said: “It doesn’t matter how you feel about Musk – no individual should have this power.”

Satellites operated by SpaceX firm are harnessed by the Ukrainian military to gather intelligence and stream live video from the battlefield, as well as coordinate defensive drone and artillery strikes.

It is understood that Musk could act solo in signing off on shutting down access to Starlink, which could block Ukrainian air strikes.

Kenneth Roth, a former executive director of Human Rights Watch, told the Telegraph that Kyiv’s military operations were “in effect being second guessed and sometimes rejected by Elon Musk, with his uncertain political loyalties and quirky personality”.

In February, Musk made his thoughts unequivocally clear when he wrote on Twitter: “We are not allowing Starlink to be used for long-range drone strikes.”

Musk has repeatedly intervened in the Ukraine war, publishing a peace plan last year that suggested Ukraine should undergo sovereignty referendums akin to those controversially conducted by Russia in occupied regions.

The Kremlin was quick to praise the billionaire’s plan as a “positive” step, while Kyiv dismissed the notion as pro-Russian.

Also last year, Musk approached the Pentagon to fun the internet service in Ukraine due to spiralling costs.

The firm estimated that offering the service for free was costing nearly $400million(£310million) annually, according to a CNN report.

The value of SpaceX meanwhile has rocketed to nearly $140billion (£109billion)